RE: Attribute Order
At 16:39 07/12/2001 -0800, Jeff Lowery wrote: >Speaking of XML that is not: > >Today I've been staring at an industry spec whose XML data model is not >definable by any schema language that I know of. Validation is currently >done by what I call "little gray boxes": open-source executables that >validate the XML document in nice, lengthy, idiosyncratic C++. > >Not being long in XML tooth, I wonder if any of you older hounds might care >to comment on how commonly such is case in the big, wide, metalanguage >world. Its positively commonplace. The trick is knowing where to draw the line. Try and implement everything in declarative grammers is impossible. To the extent that is possible, it can generate schemas that are less readable and obvious than VAX 11/780 microcode. There is a sweet spot, its application and case by case specific. You develop a nose for it but it takes a long time. Pragmatists err on the side of little gray boxes because the boxes are "little" (do something small and do it well), "gray" (plug replaceable with something else, commodity) and "boxes" (plural - use numerous little boxes to make an intractable problem tractable via divide and conquer). <Plug> I'll be talking about this and other aspects of the industrialisation of XML processing at XML 2001 next week http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/2001/thursday.htm#7 </Plug> Sean
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format