[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: validating against the standard W3C

• To: jeffrafter@d..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: validating against the standard W3C
• From: Bart.Boogaerts@A...
• Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:55:07 +0100

ok,
this answers say that to validate against the normative schema,
you have to write it in your schema (namespace declaration)

but how can you then validate this schema? Just by parsing=>gives parse exceptions but we want validation excpetions and more explanation about the possible error...

and we want to validate making use of a java api...
any idea how to do this?

I checked the deja-vu archive but couldn't find an answer to this question...

bart

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:jeffrafter@d...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:41 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: validating against the standard W3C

> Another resource is the Deja-vu archive of the XMLSchema-dev mailing list,
> again doing keyword searches. There's a number of Rec mavens on that list
> who've answered almost every question at least once.

Yeah, Eddie Robertson and Henry Thompson answered this one [1]-- I couldn't
say it better:

[1]
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001May/0127.html
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Jun/0002.html

HTH,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: validating against the standard W3C
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Converting XML to RTF
• Next by Date: Re: validating against the standard W3C
• Previous by thread: Re: validating against the standard W3C
• Next by thread: Re: validating against the standard W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread