[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute o

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:20:10 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3549BAFD79A7D411A1CF00508B62B5BC0124B92E@e...>
• References: <3549BAFD79A7D411A1CF00508B62B5BC0124B92E@e...>

At 1:44 AM -0800 12/9/01, Jeff Lowery wrote:
>REPOST <sigh/>
>--------------
>
>>  What makes a well-formed XML document "not XML" ?
>
>If some spec states that certain XML attributes are ordered, then that may
>be well-formed XML, but there's no guarantee that any processor in the wild
>is going to respect that. Is the spec still describing XML? Well, yeah,
>kinda-sorta, but it's not respecting the standard and has to be carefully
>handled. You just can't toss it off anywhere.
>

I'd argue that any spec that imposes additional constraints on 
processors not imposed by XML 1.0 is not compliant with XML. 
Requiring attribute order to be maintained would be one such 
constraint. Another would be treating a character inserted via a 
character reference differently than a character typed literally. 
(WML has this problem.) The documents in such applications might be 
well-formed XML documents, but the processors that handle these 
documents are not compliant XML parsers.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attributeorder)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Attribute Order
• Next by Date: Re: Formal definition of PSVI (was Where have the element types gone?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread