[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So mecom

• To: cowan@m...
• Subject: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So mecomments on the 1.1 draft)
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:42:40 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E16FvTM-0003Qx-00@m...> (message from John Cowan onMon, 17 Dec 2001 05:58:16 -0500 (EST))
• References: <E16FvTM-0003Qx-00@m...>

> The latter.  But FTP-ing files is not the only way of sharing them;

yes I accept ftp isn't the only way, my point was that mapping IBM end
of line to ascii/unicode #10 would not be an unreasonable or even novel
thing to do.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So mecomments on the 1.1 draft)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: DTD problem
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So mecomments on the 1.1 draft)
• Next by thread: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So me comments on the 1.1 draft)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread