Re: Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: Why wo
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > (And of course, I'm deeply depressed that XML has become _more_ complex > than SGML in many regards.) Cheer up. XML may not be layered perfectly, but at least it is layered to some degree: schema langs above Namespaces above XML 1.0. SGML was a bucket of bolts, with each application being able to declare which parts it implemented, but no real layering. We have *not* gone from bad to worse, really. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format