[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed ch

allowed characters in webdav
Nicolas LEHUEN wrote:
> So why do people keep on insisting that their XML content be readable with
> vi ? Why does it matter so much for people to be able to read XML documents
> with non appropriate tools, while we could easily have true XML viewers ?

Because one of the uses of XML is for archival purposes. If you make it readable
by only "true XML viewers" instead of plain text editors, then you've lost some
of its usefulness as an archival format. Yes, yes, I realize that not all text
editors can read all encodings, but XML is closer than proprietary formats to
this task. (Besides if disks keep getting cheaper and Unicode more wide-spread,
maybe somebody will update vi for Unicode and that will handle a majority of the

-- Ron


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.