Re: Attribute Order
"Champion, Mike" wrote: > I'd guess this discussion has the predictable conclusion: be liberal in what > you accept, and conservative in what you produce. Work to find and fix code > that makes assumptions about attribute order, but don't change attribute > order if at all possible in case a downstream application -- perhaps written > by a non-SGML veteran to a literal reading of the original XML spec -- > cares. Even someone who is minimally proficient in HTML knows that attribute order means nothing in the processing of the document. If the original XML spec literally said "attribute order is important, and must be preserved", or if there were DTD constructs for defining ordered attribute models, just as there are for defining element content models, I could see somebody making the assumption that order matters, but otherwise I don't buy this argument. Yes, it's good to preserve order... I try to do it in the processing code that I write, just as a favor, but it shouldn't be necessary, and it shouldn't be taken for granted. Maybe by writing processors that preserve attribute order, we've painted ourselves into a corner in which the user believes that it's important, and if so, that's our own fault. I propose that writers of XML processing tools begin to forcefully randomize attribute order after processing documents to teach these ungrateful users a lesson! -- Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org Developer - Apache Xindice (formerly dbXML) Maintainer - jEdit-Syntax Java Editing Bean
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format