[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python

python break
On Thursday 20 December 2001 08:18 pm, Richard Tobin wrote:
> You referred to text mode in stdio.  In Unix, there is no distinction
> between text and binary mode in stdio.  Text mode in Unix does not
> do any line-end conversion, and does not interpret control-D.  It is
> a no-op.

This is still not a reason to allow control codes. You know, as well as I do, 
that they *will* cause problems. NUL is of course even worse. One reason for 
XML's success is that it is easily manipulated by common tools (see The Art 
of Programming). We should maintain that.

My objection is really based on what makes sense for a textual markup 
language, and what doesn't.. The use of XML for database interchange, and for 
open protocols, is new, and probably part of a very short technology cycle 
(meaning that it will likely become irrelevant in the big picture, and likely 
replaced in the next 5-10 years).


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.