Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:56:30PM +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote: > Everytime someone complains "I cannot process this document because > the XML parser says I have an unexpected code point" it is victory for > software quality and reliable data interchange. Encoding problems > must be detected and dealt with at source, and not allowed to propagate > and corrupt distributed systems. I think I understand now what you are say (note the "think" :-). You are saying you would like to have the XML parser stop people feeding in streams of bytes that are in the wrong encoding. By not allowing certain values that you feel people wont want to use very often, if its in the wrong encoding its more likely to be picked up as an error by the parser. If I have understood your desire, I guess we differ here. I would rather see XML (that claims to support Unicode) support all of Unicode. I *personally* don't feel that prohibiting valid Unicode characters from appearing in documents is worth the benefit of protecting people against feeding in data in the wrong encoding. But I think I understand your point of view - and I don't get to make the final decision :-) Alan
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format