[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: WebDAV (was Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft)

Re:  WebDAV (was Re:  Some comments on the 1.1 draft)
On Thursday 20 December 2001 02:05 pm, Julian Reschke wrote:
> We are really getting off-topic here.

We are. 

> Yes. So what's the right way to address this? (a) have interoperability
> tests, (b) document the issues, (c) work on the resolution. That's what the
> Working Group does.

I agree. 

There are two things on this thread I wanted to say:

  1) That the WebDAV use of XML is ill-specified and opportunistic. 
  2) Clarity of specification is critical for interoperability. 

Your original email regarding custom properties caused my response, 
essentially saying (1). We've been debating WebDAV and (2) since then.

I think WebDAV will get better (and I may get involved in it again), but it 
doesn't need XML to change to do so.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.