Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
In article <E16GeGR-0004mt-00@m...> you write: >That was my original position: map NEL away, but don't change the >definition of the S (whitespace) production. Richard Tobin convinced >me that that position was inconsistent: embarrassingly, I can't >remember quite why. The situation is the same as for CR. If you map NEL to LF on input, it can only appear (in parsed data) as a result of character references in internal paramater entities. Adding it to S will make these parse consistently with normal input. -- Richard
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format