Re: validating against the standard W3C
> hang on a minute.. :) There are counter-examples. See the link below for > a formal specification XPath. > > http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/wadler/papers/xpath-semantics/ xpath-semantics.pdf > > This is the clearest spec of XPath I've seen, and much easier to read > than the verbose XPath spec. Then again, maybe XPath lends itself to > this kind of specification. (denotational semantics) In the XPath paper thatis as a clearest XPath spec, where is the keyword ancestor-of-self ? Are you sure that that paper is an XPath specification? Rgds.Paul.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format