[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute

RE:  Re: validating hairy data models (was  Attribute
I guess the question I'm asking is that if the document looks like XML (has
XML syntax and is well-formed) but the data model is specified in such a way
that no off-the-shelf tools can with certainty handle it (along the lines
of, say, the spec declaring attribute order to be significant, or elements
{X,Y,Z} being allowed to appear anywhere, any number of times, in any order,
including within other ordered element content models, or namespaces not
being used merely to disambiguate, but as a mechanism to insert private
elements and attributes anywhere within a document, etc.), then is it really
any more useful than any other arbitrary document syntax? Why even use XML?

Oh, I know-- marketing. Duh.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.