|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - August, 2003
- Native XML databases,
sridhar dongara
- [ANN] xmloperator 2.3,
didier demany
- RE: Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations?,
Klotz, Leigh
- Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations?,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: Linking xml files together,
DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
- Re: Mixed Content,
Jason Diamond
- RE: Question about UTF-8,
Rob McDougall
- RE: [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XSLT and default namespaces,
Paul Spencer
- [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead?,
AndrewWatt2000
- XML storage,
Helena
- Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev,
G. Ken Holman
- freeware command line toolkit for XML,
Mikhail Grushinskiy
- Linking xml files together,
Cams Ismael
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Question about UTF-8,
Gustaf Liljegren
- XML mapping to java objects,
Kunal J
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: XML and the Relational Model [long],
Jeff Lowery
- RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy),
Laurent.SABARTHEZ
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: XML.Net find node by content and change attribute,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Need help on JAXB!,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Namespace declaration and schema validation problems,
Dare Obasanjo
- The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs?,
Mike Champion
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: xml taxonomy,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xml taxonomy,
Rick Marshall
- Namespace declaration and schema validation problems,
Noelle
- Final CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003,
akmal chaudhri
- Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III,
Winchel \"Todd\" Vincent III
- XML.Net find node by content and change attribute,
Mattison
- Mondial: The CIA World Factbook in Oracle, XML, F-Logic, and Datalog,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: XPath brain teaser,
Dare Obasanjo
- [ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor ..,
John Eadie
- RE: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Jeff Lowery
- XPath brain teaser,
Roger L. Costello
- PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Synopsis - An Open Letter to,
john hardin
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
pop3
- XSLT and Schemas,
Marcus Andersson
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Mayne, Peter
- XML web programming using VB,
WCUKegger
- RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Dare Obasanjo
- XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?),
Jonathan Robie
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmentsin prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Chris Angus
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Murali Mani
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Jeff Tash
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-25,
Tech Support
- RE: Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...),
Jeff Lowery
- Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities,
john hardin
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- Re: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question),
Chiusano Joseph
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- InkML,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Schema validators,
Dare Obasanjo
- Schema validators,
Morcom, Harvey
- ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter,
xml-dev
- RE: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Nordström Ari
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21,
Tech Support
- RE: Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause?,
Eckenberger Axel
- Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause?,
Alexey Chub
- RE: Re: opposite of infoset,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Chris Wilper
- opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Robin Berjon
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- RSS for RSS?,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Tim Bray
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Bob Foster
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Thomas B. Passin
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Danny Ayers
- Re: opposite of infoset,
John Cowan
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Dimitre Novatchev
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: opposite of infoset,
Liam Quin
- RE: opposite of infoset,
Michael Kay
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Nordström Ari
- CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003,
akmal chaudhri
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Bruce.Cox
- RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Postel's Law Has No Exceptions,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0?,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- The need for a formal description,
Gustaf Liljegren
- Re: XACML adding new functions,
Seth Proctor
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: RelaxNG question,
rjelliffe
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Jonathan Borden
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Jonathan Borden
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Dave Beckett
- RDF and RELAX NG,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: RDF and RELAX NG,
Jonathan Borden
- Re: RDF and RELAX NG,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: RDF and RELAX NG,
Jonathan Borden
- RE: RDF and RELAX NG,
Danny Ayers
- Re: RDF and RELAX NG,
Jonathan Borden
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Tim Bray
- Re: RelaxNG question,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: RelaxNG question,
Sean McGrath
- RE: question on XQuery -> SQL translators,
Dare Obasanjo
- The XML Acronym Demystifier,
Michael Wilson
- [Fwd: [cam] Re: A standard approach to glueing togetherreusable XML fragments in prose?],
Chiusano Joseph
- RE: tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD,
Roche, Conrad (Cognizant)
- RelaxNG question,
Tim Bray
- A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Roger L. Costello
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XMLfragments in prose?,
Mitch Amiano
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
dbexcom
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Sai Surya Kiran Evani
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
lbradshaw
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Mitch Amiano
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Scott Parnell
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
dbexlist
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Michael Fuller
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
dbexcom
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Mike Champion
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach toglueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Liam Quin
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
John Cowan
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bob Foster
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Bob Foster
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Mitch Amiano
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Mitch Amiano
- Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
pop3
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
lbradshaw
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
lbradshaw
- XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Mike Champion
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...),
Murali Mani
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...),
Tim Bray
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standardapproach to glueing together ...),
Mitch Amiano
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...),
Rick Marshall
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...),
Murali Mani
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
lbradshaw
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Mike Champion
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
pop3
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
pop3
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
pop3
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...),
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: Astandard approach to glueing together ...),
Jim Ancona
- Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: XML and the Relational Model,
lbradshaw
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Frank
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Mike Champion
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Frank
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Frank
- Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
dbexlist
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Bob Foster
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Berend de Boer
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model,
Bob Foster
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME.,
pop3
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME.,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME.,
John Cowan
- Need help on JAXB!,
Srivathsan C
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Michael Fuller
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Tim Bray
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
John Cowan
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Daniel Veillard
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
John Cowan
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Tim Bray
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Daniel Veillard
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Jonathan Borden
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?,
Rick Marshall
- Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?,
Chiusano Joseph
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?,
Nordström Ari
- Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P...,
AndrewWatt2000
- Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent,
Jonathan Robie
- Parsing XML,
Manik
- Announcement: XML Acronym Demystifier,
Mario Jeckle
- Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml,
xml tom
- The State of the XUL Union,
Gerald Bauer
- RE: Java SAX tools (was: Re: Adding standalone="yes" to XML document),
Paul Brown
- Wiki SVG whiteboard,
Bill de hÓra
- thinking about "namespace pedantry",
james anderson
- Python/XML parsing,
Donald Traboini
- Help with Schema,
Wilson David
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: Paypal)),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Paypal,
Dare Obasanjo
- [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0.3,
George Cristian Bina
- RE: Adding standalone="yes" to XML document,
Dare Obasanjo
- SMIL markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- XACML adding new functions,
Natalie.Krainski
- Adding standalone="yes" to XML document,
Bhargav Bharath
- RE: Re: Silly indemnity FUD,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree?,
reinhard gantar
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: Silly indemnity FUD),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- embedding RDF in XHTML,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Cox, Bruce
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Adding standalone,
Bhargav Bharath
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bruce.Cox
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE,
Derek Denny-Brown
- ANN: eXist native XML database 0.9.2,
Wolfgang Meier
- Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE,
Perry A. Caro
- Re: Automated ASCII to XML converter,
Bryce K. Nielsen
- Automated ASCII to XML converter,
Donald Traboini
- Web Services and URIs,
Chiusano Joseph
- ANN: Syntext Serna Beta Release: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor,
xml-dev
- graphs and trees,
Simon St.Laurent
- ANN: Enhancing Data Interoperability with Ontologies, Canonical Forms, and Include Files,
Roger L. Costello
- Re: Oasis website down?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Random thoughts on reflection,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiplemodule DTD,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: Determining version of MSXML in use,
Micah Dubinko
- Determining version of MSXML in use,
Micah Dubinko
- RE: Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform,
Klotz, Leigh
- Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform,
Cameron Shorter
- RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension,
bryan
- [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released,
Edwin Dankert
- RE: What does RSS stand for?,
Bedros Hanounik
- What does RSS stand for?,
AndrewWatt2000
- ANN: InferEd (RDF Editor w/ Inference) Beta2 Released,
Derrish Repchick
- RTF to XML Conversion (Majix or otherwise),
Jim Caprio
- XML-XML Mapping,
John Gibby
- ANNOUNCE: VixX3D Beta Edtor,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Encoding URI's for xml validation,
Jerry Sheehan
- Re: new line handling (DOMBuilder and DOMSerializer),
John Cowan
- RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XMLURL problem!,
SETH,MANOJ (HP-India,ex2)
RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless element that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Number of name characters?,
Jeff Lowery
Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless element that is not the document node - how?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: A parentless element that is not the document node -how?,
Betty Harvey
RE: A parentless element that is not the document node - how?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Number of name characters?,
Gustaf Liljegren
RE: String interning (Was: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?),
Hunsberger, Peter
A parentless element that is not the document node - how?,
Roger L. Costello
Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?,
Liam Quin
Re[2]: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook,
kew
Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?,
Chiusano Joseph
RE: How did "public identifier" get its name...,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?),
David Megginson
XSL transformation clientside errors,
Ali Asghar Safri
Re: more politics,
Sean McGrath
multiple schemas, annotations,
Simon St.Laurent
Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?),
Simon St.Laurent
Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes,
Bob Foster
Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@r...: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)],
John Cowan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
