[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensi
Isn't that why some have suggested dereferencing the namespace to RDF or RDDL documents? In other words, there are those pursuing solutions to this. The fact that the name might serve a dual role (lexical disambiguation and named location) seems to work. Why not? len From: james anderson [mailto:james.anderson@s...] naming the set of symbols is meaningless. one has to name the combinations. by which i do not mean the sequencing, dominance, and lexical constraints one can express in a document definition. a system which a-priori names the combinations according to the name used to disambiguate one of the respective lexical tokens is going to be a dead end. what does one do with versions? with variations in authority? what does one call it when it's a soap wrapper only, and a particular payload only, and in combination only? etc.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|