[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensi
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] At 8:40 AM -0500 8/14/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >Yes. Only I can't think of any reason eBay or Google >would raise a lawyer's paranoia quotient. eBay goes >to great lengths to police the actions of it's users. >Google just relies on a PageRank algorithm (possibly >patented) that is an opinion meter and even if it >seems odd, it also works for most topics. >eBay has massive exposure due to auction fraud. They also have big >problems with the sale of forbidden items in various jurisdictions. >(e.g. Nazi memorabilia in France, pornography in Kentucky, etc.) Yes, and as a result, they have been investing resources to police these problems. It isn't always possible to account for everything that users can do, but that is not the same as not warranting the services they provide. There are always legal costs to doing business. I don't think anyone here believes one can eliminate legal hassles; I think it possible to get a better deal than caveat emptor code purchases. >Paypal's under investigation for failing to adhere to various states' >banking legislation and could serve as a conduit for money >laundering. Yes. Like online medical services, this is a particularly litigation prone domain and subject to the vagaries of local regulation. This is similar to the tax collection problems. For example, online music equipment merchandisers cite the 'New Jersey' exception. Other states will get into this action as soon as the Feds relax constraints. I don't know much about it, but I expect each country to begin to tax Internet sales as each locality begins to realize the extent of the drain. >Google (or any search engine really) has massive >copyright exposure due to caching of pages. Tricky. Here is a situation where the act of using the medium of publishing exposes the authors to copyright violations not by theft but the nature of the medium or publication. This is similar to the problem of the use of taped or any reproducible media. One has to make exceptions for fair use. I wonder if the cache could be construed as fair use. >Fortunately, these companies didn't let any of this stop them. They are dealing with problems as they come up. Nothing unbusiness-like about that. The idea that namespaces and vetted code registries could be used with royalty-free standards implementations that explcitly require warrantied submissions is an example of dealing with a problem as it comes up. Fortunately, nothing stops this from happening either. Perhaps the analog to the 'hordes of lawyers' is 'the mob mentality'. >If you're successful >enough, the penalties for this, both direct and indirect, are simply >a cost of doing business. Napster's real failure was that they got >hit with legal action before they had a large enough revenue stream >to cope. No because even the buy out by the bigger firm couldn't change the mind of the courts with regards to the actions. Some things money won't buy; one of them is the privilege to profit by theft. len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|