[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev
My guess is that from their point of view, the filers are the public. How could that work any other way? They are there to serve policy, not set it. The quarrel may be with the policy makers not the agency designated to implement it. Do the patent treaties need revision? Heck yes. Bruce says that those who should are working that issue. Slow though it may be, the right way to influence that is through your local congressional representatives by lobbying. Who lobbies for IP reform? The large IP holders of course (say Disney). Who lobbies for the user or non-IP holder? That is what one should look into. The EFF is one. To help them along, the local representatives of the legal authorities have to be made aware that the IP fights breaking out will fracture the industry, lead to suboptimal even if affordable or free systems, and that is their job to work as the public representatives to change the laws to recognize the changed environment. One means, even if Draconian, is to extend concepts of emminent domain to the essential facilities of the public systems. How far can that go? Ideally, royalty free standards. At what cost? The standards organizations will be made to more precise, more constrained, but better focused standards and not just any organization will be empowered to do it. Likely soon? Probably not. I think we as a community will have to mature more to finally understand the problem and how it can be solved without undue overturning of property rights yet with attention to the public needs. Hard problem. len -----Original Message----- From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit: > Thank you, Bruce. In the years since the topics of IP and > patents first appeared on this list, yours is the first positive > and informed response that enables us to understand what > steps are being taken to apply technologies of interest > to the list members, and to improve the patent processes > across national boundaries. Quite often the responses > have been to place all blame on one nation, or to fault > the patent process in its most general case by claiming > that patents are obsolete and should be done away with. As long as the USPTO believes that its purpose is to serve patent filers rather than the public, it is unlikely that technological fixes will do anything about the current problem. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Allen Brown jcowan@r...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|