[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmen

• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: 21 Aug 2003 10:34:31 +1000
• Cc: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3F4408BD.2090407@t...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Limited
• References: <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819112123.00aa4b78@p...> <3F42ADD5.DEB3D8B@b...> <1061335543.4452.31.camel@z...> <3F436C28.ED876A0D@b...> <20030820231503.GA27842@i...> <3F4408BD.2090407@t...>
• Reply-to: rjm@z...

i hope it is in linux land - we've been running 64bit solaris for a few
years and are about to install linux based itanium 2 ibm multi processor
(subject to budget approval, etc, etc, etc) running linux - our database
system compiled natively on it - just like it is on the sparc

but at 5 to 10 times the cost of a 32 bit server you have to need the
power to justify the cost

i'm pretty sure we're nowhere near the first to try

rick

On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:48, Tim Bray wrote:
> Michael Fuller wrote:
> 
> > It's what, 10 years since the DEC released the 64-bit Alpha;
> > the 64-bit Sun SPARC processors are 5+, at the least.
> > 64-bit computing is mature, main-stream technology.
> 
> Doesn't seem to be really there in linux-land yet, as far as I can tell. 
>   I'd be delighted to hear differently though. -Tim
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
• Next by Date: Re: opposite of infoset
• Previous by thread: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose?
• Next by thread: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread