[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standar


standar model
--- Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
wrote:

> >Reconciliation?  You mean so that RM is the same as
> a Tree Model, and vice 
> >versa? I suppose a translation or interpretive
> method can be done, but 
> >that does not make RM native to the Tree Model, or
> vice versa.
> 
> Of course not. Every model is a universe unto
> itself. Computer Science 
> allows more than one model. Mappings among models
> are useful.

Yup. And new models can come along that transcend the
competing models into special cases of a more abstract
model.  I guess the canonical example would be the
wave vs particle models of light; to the best of my
very limited understanding, they can be reconciled as
special cases of a quantum electrodynamical
thingamabob.  My original point was that people are
actively looking for tree-relational thingamabobs that
would do likewise for the RM and XML.

In the meantime, people gotta do what they gotta do to
get the job done, I guess. I'd be very surprised to
find a truly successful pure relational approach to
the kind of terrabyte-scale, evolving document
scenario that started this thread.  An ad-hoc
combination of the salient ideas from the relational
approach (e.g. normalization, using value-based joins
rather than hard-coded pointers or entity references
to compose document components), the XML approach
(e.g. hierarchical containment as an efficient way to
bundle tightly related bits of information), and
practical DBMS engineering techniques (e.g. indexes,
transaction processing, database distribution and
replication) seems like the most sensible approach to
real-world problems.

Totally Off-Topic: if Marie Curie had "waited to do
the math" [as someone in one of these threads
suggested] she might well have avoided an early death
from cancer, but she might well have avoided the
immortality she achieved by following her vision. 
Comparison's with Rosalind Franklin seem apt -- she
did wait for the hard data rather than playing with
ball and stick models, and died young anyway; it was
decades before her contributions were recognized.  Not
too many of us would last long on the payroll after
assuring the Pointy Haired Boss that although it takes
hours to do each 100-way join required to perform a
transaction that was specified to be done in seconds,
he/she should take comfort from the database
application's firm grounding in predicate logic and
set theory :-)



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.