[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations?

roundoff error
Jonathan Borden scripsit:

> to be practical, if your measurement error is much greater than the 
> possible roundoff error you are ok. if you need to completely avoid 
> roundoff error, then you generally convert the problem to integer (e.g. 
> bigint) and deal with the radii (plural of radix?) and moduli. then 
> there's the lispish way of dealing with this problem, which is to return 
> a formulaic expression that can be evaluated by the client to get the 
> desired result :-)

Common Lisp and Scheme have a fraction datatype, which often does what's
needed in these case.  2 divided by 3 is 2/3, not 0, not 0.666666666666667.

John Cowan  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com  jcowan@r...
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.