[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
Liam Quin wrote: >>Adding even more confusion is the fact that the CFP pretty much puts gzip >>up against ASN.1 when there are many more solutions, > > I hope we do get more solutions offered in position papers. How can you compare gzip and ASN.1? One's a function from bit strings to (ideally smaller) bit strings, one's a function from information to bit strings. I can't come to this event, but if anyone starts comparing gzip and ASN.1, please shout at them for me? Gzip is something you can do to *any* encoding to get a more compact encoding at the loss of time and space costs on encoding and decoding devices. So compare XML to ASN.1's BER or PER, and gzipped XML to gzipped BER or PER. I'm sick of seeing people say "I ran this complex compression algorithm on my inefficient format and it came out smaller than this less inefficient format"! ABS
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|