[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:37, Mike Champion wrote: > > Is there any chance that someone could elaborate? > I've heard that there are lots of these anecdotes, but > I don't know any details. > > Certainly a straightforward normalization of a serious > document-oriented schema such as DocBook would lead to > a nightmarish number of tables, but I'm not clear > offhand on why normalizing just the metadata would be > such a problem. > If the metadata is simply, author(s) and issue, which might be all Nature wants, clearly it's not a problem. If you're trying to trace the development of a corpus, where essays become chapters of books, works are reprinted under different titles, authors change their names (and pseudonyms are exposed), journals change their names (and issue numbering/naming schemes), essays that became chapters of books are also reissued in second editions (as essays) with different co-authors.... The first such project I worked on was just that, with the added fillip of being about science fiction, so you got to track characters, series (story cycles), universes and ghu knows what else. The second was 15 years later and involved goverment documents. It was attempting to bring a massive semi-structured database off of a y2k vulnerable system. The whole project was botched from top to bottom, but that didn't make attempting to move from semi-structured to relational any less of a nightmare. Frank
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|