[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that

• To: "'mitch.amiano@s...'" <mitch.amiano@s...>
• Subject: RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:29:22 -0500
• Cc: 'Bob Foster' <bob@o...>, John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...

Then there are those projects to renovate buildings that are 
solid and were built when superior materials and workmanship were 
cheaper and cannot be duplicated at today's prices, yet can be 
renovated.  I used to work home restoration when in college. 
We saved some spectacular homes from being replaced by 
condoSquats.

I believe there probably are products out there in 
niches where the technology or standard was ahead 
of its time that can now be reclaimed.  The VRML 
examples are pertinent such as the CosmoPlayer 
code, the Ligos editor, etc.  Would they need updating? 
Sure.  Code reclamation; more jobs for programmers.

We used to do this sort of thing at NASA.  Whole 
systems were reclaimed from musty Fortran because 
even if the code was old, the math was spectacular.

len


From: Mitch Amiano [mailto:mamiano@n...]

I'm reminded of a commercial renovation project,
http://www.thealtamont.com/, in which each of the nine stories has been
gutted. The partition walls were made from clay tube tiles. Tube tiles are
like concrete blocks - extremely strong with superior fire resistance. But
no one works with tile partition walls anymore and trying to work around
them would take more money than the market would bear. Removing them means
that several tons of dead weight are eliminated from the load on each floor.
They are now called "clean fill". 

Even when the market thinks some old building has value, it is often more
economical to raze it down to the superstructure, or completely down to the
ground upon which it stands. If a bunch of vagrants happen to inhabit the
building prior to renovation it may be said to hold some value to them, but
that isn't economically relevant to the owners. It doesn't seem to be borne
of pride or presumption, but perhaps there is sometimes a lack of vision. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
• Next by Date: RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Next by thread: Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread