[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xml taxonomy
<Quote1> by focusing on well defined sets of xml structures and their properties </Quote1> I wish you the best on this effort, but would also like to caution that many aspects of XML are not as cut-and-dried as your numbers analogy. Our recent discussions on "document vs. data-oriented XML" exemplified that, where we saw that one person's document-oriented XML is another person's data-oriented XML, and there are hybrids as well. <Quote2> one set might be xml with tags only - no attributes; another might be xml that is constrained to two levels; etc </Quote2> What value would there be to labeling these types of XML (e.g. "attribute-less" XML, "two-level" XML)? This seems to me to be something that can be better covered by an XML schema design (if we are talking about schemas here) than a broad classification. IOW, an organization/agency may decide for whatever reason that they want to avoid the use of attributes. It also appears to me that the combinations/permutations of the different aspects here can become quite extensive and perhaps unmaintainable. <Quote3> by understanding the properties and operators that are valid on these sets we can then see the analogies to other technologies such as relational models, markup, etc. </Quote3> Perhaps there are easier ways to reach this goal? Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton Rick Marshall wrote: > > hi all > > following several discussions we've had lately, mostly on relational > models and document management i'm going to float the idea - which may > be covered elsewhere, please redirect me if appropriate - that having a > taxonomy of xml may help us to understand what forms, and when are good > for different problems. > > if we take numbers as an analogy (and that's all it is, there are plenty > of others) they can be divided into sets - integer, real, rational, > irrational, complex, etc and we increase our understanding and use of > numbers by developing theorems that cover the different sets. > > it seems to me that xml is as diverse as numbers or any similar grouping > and that by focusing on well defined sets of xml structures and their > properties we can get the theorems to improve our use and understanding. > > eg one set might be xml with tags only - no attributes; another might be > xml that is constrained to two levels; etc > > by understanding the properties and operators that are valid on these > sets we can then see the analogies to other technologies such as > relational models, markup, etc. > > just a thought at the moment > > cheers > > rick > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b... title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|