[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RelaxNG question
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@p...] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:18 PM > To: Tim Bray > Cc: XML Dev > Subject: Re: RelaxNG question > > it will allow child elements to be in no namespace, I'm not > sure you can spec the rejection of non-namepaced elements > with rng; anyway it seems a daft enough constraint. Because your favorite schema language does not support the feature does not make it a daft constraint. The ability to negate wildcards is an oft requested feature of users of W3C XML Schema and makes sense if one could write something akin to <xs:any namespace="not(##targetNamespace)" /> although in this case I assume Tim would want something akin to <xs:any namespace="not(##targetNamespace ##local)" /> -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM People can be divided into two types: those who still possess a fierce hunting instinct and those who pay to park. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|