[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
John Cowan wrote: >Dennis Sosnoski scripsit: > > >>I'm getting a several times (2-4X) performance improvement using my XMLS >>format (http://www.sosnoski.com/opensrc/xmls), as compared to SAX2 >>parsing of text. >> >> > >It would be interesting to compare this special-purpose well-formed-XML >compression with a general compression algorithm tuned for speed and >small space rather than compact compression, such as LZO >(http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/). There is a Java implementation >available there under the GPL. > It'd be interesting to see how fast something like LZO works on the text files, but it wouldn't really be a comparison with XMLS. The whole point of XMLS is to work with infoset items rather than text. If you compress text with LZO (or any other text-based compression scheme) you still have to convert to and from the infoset as an added processing step. I've actually renamed the new code as XBIS, partially to emphasize this (and partially because xmls.org was already taken when I looked into getting an appropriate domain earlier this year...). - Dennis
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|