[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: rss 0.91 with rdf extension

• To: bryan <bry@i...>, wkearney99@h...
• Subject: Re: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
• From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:08:02 +0300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000401c35d81$5bc1d5a0$2001a8c0@bryans>
• Organization: Netsmart S.A., Greece
• References: <000401c35d81$5bc1d5a0$2001a8c0@bryans>
• Reply-to: mbatsis@n...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4)Gecko/20030624

Bill is right here. In the web environment, HTTP headers should be used 
to determine MIME etc with extentions just being a fallback mechanism. 
You can always get just the headers with an HTTP HEAD; no need to 
request the whole resource.

Cheers,

Manos

bryan wrote:
> 
> Bill wrote:
> 
>>The extension doesn't matter a whit.
> 
> 
>>It's the delivered MIME type that matters more, which is
>>application/rss+xml
>>regardless of version.
> 
> 
> Are there any systems out there that determine the MIME type by
> extension? Yes. 
> So if the MIME type matters more, then on those systems the extension
> can be considered to matter as much as the MIME type, with whatever
> additional meaningfulness can be ascribed to the extension.
> 
> Currently as far as I know there is no web server/application that
> returns MIME type of xml by instance structure. It wouldn't be too
> difficult to build an app that did this however. 
> 
> Another thing would be, what if say, I'm building an application that
> searches the web for RDF, one of the things I'm gonna do is go by
> extension... an extension on the web is an important method for
> determining advisability of issuing a GET against the resource,
> obviously one always has to provide filtering but originally I was
> thinking that there was a particular product outputting rss version 0.91
> with a RDF extension. If so this was some good data to have. 
> 
> 
> Bob wrote:
> 
> 
>>I just pulled down the feed with a pubDate of Thu, 07 Aug 2003 02:33:38
> 
> PST >and I don't see any RDF in there.
> 
> Right the original reason I found it was that I was looking for files
> with rdf extension and then just the text rss, which I was hoping to
> parse further to find rss 1.0 files, I got that feed from Wired, so I
> thought, that's interesting data if indeed there is a product that
> outputs rss 0.91 with RDF extension, I have a good chance of identifying
> feeds running said product, Dave Winer indicated it was probably "based
> on Vignette" and "There was a lot of confusion about what RDF was back
> when Wired's feed came online." Thus indicating that unfortunately this
> was unlikely to be useful data. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> 

-- 
Manos Batsis

     _  __    __                    __
    / |/ /__ / /____ __ _ ___ _____/ /_
   /    / -_) __(_-</  ' Y _ `/ __/ __/
  /_/|_/\__/\__/___/_/_/_|_,_/_/  \__/

http://www.netsmart.gr
mbatsis at netsmart dot gr
(+30) 210 33 02 608
(+30) 210 33 02 658
http://forte.netsmart.gr/foaf/manos_foaf.rdf

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
• Next by Date: RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
• Previous by thread: RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
• Next by thread: RE: rss 0.91 with rdf extension
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread