[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unkn

• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@r...: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)]
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:31:25 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <036801c357cb$4144a060$1401a8c0@snobird>
• References: <20030731170625.GZ9926@s...> <036801c357cb$4144a060$1401a8c0@snobird>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Bob Foster scripsit:

> As long as no further cans of Coke drop no matter how many times the GET is
> invoked, the GET is idempotent.

Oh yes, quite so.  I was thinking only of the case where each GET 
produces a new can.  But in any event, the correct point d'appui is
"safety", not "idempotency".

-- 
"By Elbereth and Luthien the Fair, you shall    jcowan@r...
have neither the Ring nor me!"  --Frodo         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Next by Date: Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Next by thread: Re: Defining non-WXS datatypes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread