[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RelaxNG question

• To: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Subject: RE: RelaxNG question
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:21:08 -0700
• Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,"XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcNl1dBiC5KFMi4vRqG1hJ2t4E7ItQAABhcg
• Thread-topic: RelaxNG question

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@p...] 
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Tim Bray; XML Dev
> Subject: Re:  RelaxNG question
> 
> 
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapbody
> 
> I read the section and saw nothing that required the negation 
> of non-namespaced names. Unless you're looking to 
> overconstrain SOAP, perhaps you can explain your thinking, or 
> get back on topic.

"All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information item:

SHOULD have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is the name of the element SHOULD be namespace qualified." 

Of course, nothing stops you from being pedantic and arguing that a SHOULD is not a requirement. There is also http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-attribute-node which may require banning attributes without a namespace name. 

Anyway the point is that there are XML vocabularies that have this characteristic which unfortunately cannot be described by any of the popular XML schema languages. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
People can be divided into two types: those who still possess a fierce hunting instinct and those who pay to park.                                                       

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by Date: RE: RelaxNG question
• Previous by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Next by thread: RE: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread