XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - September, 1999

• UML and XML enabled systems, tedken
• CDATA problem, John Evdemon
  • Re: CDATA problem, John Cowan
  • Re: CDATA problem, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: CDATA problem, Andrew Layman
  • RE: CDATA problem, Tim Bray
• ANNOUNCE: xmlhack.com: developer news from the XML community, Edd Dumbill
• XML.Dll, Saleemi N., Fa. Eurosoft
• Dynamic XML, David Lindholm
  • RE: Dynamic XML, Heikki Toivonen
  • Re: Dynamic XML, Vilya Harvey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Dynamic XML, Kieran O'Shea
  • RE: Dynamic XML, GW
  • RE: Dynamic XML, Kieran O'Shea
• ANNOUNCE: XML::RSS 0.6, Jonathan Eisenzopf
• Re: Discussion of namespace issues, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Discussion of namespace issues, Andrew Layman
• XML Processing Description Language, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: LISTADMIN Attchments (was Re: Check this), Oliver Becker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: LISTADMIN Attchments (was Re: Check this), Michael.Orr
• RE: groves dissent, Marc.McDonald
• RE: Language that do with XML?, DuCharme, Robert
• dtddiff of XSDL 5/99 and 9/99, DuCharme, Robert
• ANN: Schema Converters, Version 1.0, Ronald Bourret
• MSXML and Proxy Server, kakui
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MSXML and Proxy Server, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
• Off topic [Fwd: Check this], Marcus Carr
  • Re: Off topic [Fwd: Check this], Marcus Carr
    • Re: Off topic [Fwd: Check this], Arjun Ray
• Check this, Bob Harris
  • LISTADMIN Attchments (was Re: Check this), Rzepa, Henry
• Identical production rules, Pierre Morel
  • Re: Identical production rules, Eric Bohlman
• Loss of effective schema validation by DTDs with today's working drafts, Arnold, Curt
• CDataSection in Node, Eddie Shipman
  • Re: CDataSection in Node, Steve Schafer
• Markup translations, Eddie Shipman
  • Re: Markup translations, Steve Schafer
• Notation declarations before attribute list declarations?, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Notation declarations before attribute list declarations?, John Cowan
    • Re: Notation declarations before attribute list declarations?, David Brownell
• Packaging and related-resource discovery, Tim Bray
  • Re: Packaging and related-resource discovery, Mark D. Anderson
  • Re: Packaging and related-resource discovery, Steven R. Newcomb
• Attributes and namespaces, Shawn Silverman
  • Re: Attributes and namespaces, David Megginson
  • Re: Attributes and namespaces, John Cowan
    • Re: Attributes and namespaces, Shawn Silverman
  • Re: Attributes and namespaces, G. Ken Holman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Attributes and namespaces, Andrew Layman
• New public working draft of XML Schema, comments invited, Henry S. Thompson
• specifying DOCTYPE DTD for XSL transformation, Volkmann, Mark
• Writing an online help in XML, louise.lahiff
• ANN: Version 2.27 of Perl module XML::Parser released, Clark Cooper
• XML and HTTP reverse proxies (was: Re: Announce: Prefs distribution thru XML-RPC), John Tigue
• SAX C/C++ Implementations?, David Megginson
  • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Jun Fujisawa
  • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Holger Flörke
    • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Steinar Bang
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, mlepage
      • Message not available
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Steinar Bang
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, mlepage
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Steinar Bang
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, mlepage
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, David Megginson
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, mlepage
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, David Megginson
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, mlepage
      • RE: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Guenter Obiltschnig
  • Re: SAX C/C++ Implementations?, Tim Bray
• ANN: XML-DBMS, Version 1.0, Ronald Bourret
• Oracle XML Parser:Invalid UTF8 encoding, Eddie Shipman
• Want to speak about Java/XML/Graphics in Houston in November?, Tim Bray
• groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Reynolds, Gregg
  • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Steven R. Newcomb
    • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), John Cowan
    • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Matthew Gertner
      • Re: groves dissent, Len Bullard
      • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Steven R. Newcomb
  • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Paul Prescod
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Marc.McDonald
    • Re: groves dissent, David Megginson
      • Re: groves dissent, Arjun Ray
• What are XML Parsers?, vidhya Krishnamoorthy
• How to transform only unique nodes in XSLT?, Anand K
• Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Anders W. Tell
  • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Steven R. Newcomb
    • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Anders W. Tell
  • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Christopher Travers
  • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, W. Eliot Kimber
    • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Ken MacLeod
      • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Anders W. Tell
      • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Paul Prescod
      • Language that do with XML?, Kevin Hsu
      • Re: Grooves: why are "data" designed as properties and not nodes ?, Anders W. Tell
• Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@n...: Returned mail: User unknown], Ann Navarro
  • Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@n...: Returned mail: User unknown], David Carlisle
• unsuscribe xml-dev, Mohideen, Khaja (CTS)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • unsuscribe xml-dev, Willers, Inga
  • unsuscribe xml-dev, Shirley A. Carter
  • RE: unsuscribe xml-dev, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
  • Re: unsuscribe xml-dev, Oliver Becker
• RE: Don't forget Robin Cover's site, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
• RE: XMLized mails (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
  • Re: XMLized mails (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Michael Champion
    • Re: XMLized mails (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XMLized mails (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
• RE: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
    • XMLized mails (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Miloslav Nic
• #2 Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Rick Jelliffe
• unsubscribe xml-dev, Perttu Auramo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • unsubscribe XML-DEV, huisien
• (Off topic) Shaken not stirred, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: (Off topic) Shaken not stirred, Daniel Veillard
• IBMs XML for Java and JBuilder, Flash Gordon
• Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Sebastien Sahuc
  • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Marcus Carr
  • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Pavel Velikhov
    • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Pavel Velikhov
      • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Len Bullard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Elements cannot be described more than once in DTD, right ?, Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Attributes vs. text content, John Tigue
  • RE: Attributes vs. text content, Erik James Freed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Attributes vs. text content, joubin
• XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Andrew Layman
  • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, David Brownell
  • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Arjun Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Miles Sabin
  • re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, David Carlisle
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Andrew Layman
    • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Arjun Ray
    • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, David Brownell
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Andrew Layman
    • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Matthew Gertner
      • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Matthew Gertner
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Marc.McDonald
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Marc.McDonald
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Andrew Layman
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces, Marc.McDonald
• Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), joubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Mark Birbeck
  • Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), joubin
• Xml Messaging, Rick Sanderson
  • Re: Xml Messaging, Mark Baker
    • Re: Xml Messaging, Rick Sanderson
      • Re: Xml Messaging, Mark Baker
  • Re: Xml Messaging, Ken MacLeod
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Xml Messaging, Mark Birbeck
    • Re: Xml Messaging, Rick Sanderson
• evaluating predicate on XML documents., jean-marie sulmont
• newbie-ish DTD question: am i asking too much of XML, or of my brain?, Rick Wayne
  • RE: newbie-ish DTD question: am i asking too much of XML, or of my brain?, Pete Beazley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: newbie-ish DTD question: am i asking too much of XML, or of my brain?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: newbie-ish DTD question: am i asking too much of XML, or of my brain?, Len Bullard
• RE: Attributes and XML-RPC, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
• Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, John Tigue
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Marcus Carr
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Marcus Carr
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Marcus Carr
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Don Park
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Marcus Carr
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, G. Ken Holman
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Marcus Carr
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Carsten Oberscheid
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Leigh Dodds
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Carsten Oberscheid
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Carsten Oberscheid
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Don Park
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Edd Dumbill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tim Bray
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, David Brownell
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Erik James Freed
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
    • Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Jeff Greif
      • Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Joshua E. Smith
      • Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC), Mark Nutter
      • Re: Attributes vs. text content (Was Re: RFC: Attributes andXML-RPC), Marcus Carr
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Reynolds, Gregg
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Erik James Freed
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Steven R. Newcomb
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Steven Livingstone
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Erik James Freed
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Hunter, David
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, David Megginson
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Julian Reschke
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Julian Reschke
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Julian Reschke
      • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Walter Underwood
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Joshua E. Smith
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Tyler Baker
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Blair Murri
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Reynolds, Gregg
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Blair Murri
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Blair Murri
    • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Mark Nutter
  • RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Andrew Layman
    • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Steven Livingstone
      • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Walter Underwood
• ID/IDREF-like Definitions in the Schema itself, Friedhelm Krebs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ID/IDREF-like Definitions in the Schema itself, Philip Nye
• multidirectional links with XLINK, Friedhelm Krebs
  • Re: multidirectional links with XLINK, W. Eliot Kimber
    • Re: multidirectional links with XLINK, Philip Nye
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: multidirectional links with XLINK, DuCharme, Robert
• We gotta break up these digests, roddey
  • Re: We gotta break up these digests, Eric Bohlman
  • Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Leigh Dodds
    • Re: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Lisa Rein
      • Re: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Ken MacLeod
      • Re: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Dave Winer
      • RE: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Leigh Dodds
      • RE: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Don Park
      • Don't forget Robin Cover's site, David Megginson
      • RE: Don't forget Robin Cover's site, Don Park
      • RE: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Leigh Dodds
    • Re: Summaries please! (RE: We gotta break up these digests), Simon St.Laurent
• (un)subscribe xml-dev, Gordon Jenkinson
  • RE: (un)subscribe xml-dev, Paul R. Brown
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (un)subscribe xml-dev, AZEEM SALIM A
  • RE: (un)subscribe xml-dev, Blair Murri
  • Fwd: RE: (un)subscribe xml-dev, Shirley A. Carter
    • RE: RE: (un)subscribe xml-dev, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: RE: (un)subscribe xml-dev, Ronald Bourret
• PGML/VML Books, Flash Gordon
  • Re: PGML/VML Books, Lisa Rein
    • Re: PGML/VML Books, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: PGML/VML Books, David Megginson
  • Re: PGML/VML Books, Simon St.Laurent
• XPath and XQL, Erik James Freed
  • Re: XPath and XQL, Zsolt Czinkos
    • RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC, Dave Winer
      • RE: Attributes and XML-RPC, Don Park
  • Re: XPath and XQL, schen
    • Re: XPath and XQL, Ingo Macherius
• NOTICE: Megginson's Sprynet home page closing, David Megginson
• Parsers for XML Schema, Mallikarjuna Sangappa
  • RE: Parsers for XML Schema, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Parsers for XML Schema, LUCIO PICOLLI
  • RE: Parsers for XML Schema, DuCharme, Robert
  • RE: Parsers for XML Schema, DuCharme, Robert
• Statement from HTML WG, Ann Navarro
  • Re: Statement from HTML WG, John Cowan
  • Re: Statement from HTML WG, David Brownell
  • Re: Statement from HTML WG, Oren Ben-Kiki
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Statement from HTML WG, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Statement from HTML WG, Ann Navarro
  • Re: Statement from HTML WG, David Carlisle
  • RE: Statement from HTML WG, Marc.McDonald
• Announce: Prefs distribution thru XML-RPC, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Announce: Prefs distribution thru XML-RPC, John Tigue
    • Re: Announce: Prefs distribution thru XML-RPC, Dave Winer
• Expat - basic help, Nigel Robbins
• RE: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object. [was.. Another try on Groves], Sean Mc Grath
  • Re: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object., Paul Prescod
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object. [was.. Another try on Groves], Mark Birbeck
• Re xml-dev Digest V1 #348, Frank Boumphrey
  • Re: Re xml-dev Digest V1 #348, Oren Ben-Kiki
• Some notes on process: F2F & telcon & email, Tim Bray
  • RE: Some notes on process: F2F & telcon & email, Don Park
• namespace for unparsed entity, Simon St.Laurent
• You can't tell the players without a program, Jon Bosak
• should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, James Tauber
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, schen
    • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, Michael Champion
      • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, schen
      • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, James Tauber
      • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, David Brownell
      • RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, Erik James Freed
    • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, David Megginson
      • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, Robert C. Lyons
  • RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, Robert C. Lyons
  • RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?, Tim McCune
• W3C and 'small vendors'., Paul Tchistopolskii
  • Re: W3C and 'small vendors'., Daniel Veillard
    • Re: W3C and 'small vendors'., Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: W3C and 'small vendors'., David Megginson
• A working alternative to XML Data Binding (An Open Source Release Notice), Bill la Forge
• SOAP non-opera (was CNET on XHTML) [re-send], John Tigue
• Nimble: An XML conformant programming language, Joshua E. Smith
• On a more pleasant note, Tim Bray
  • Re: On a more pleasant note, Daniel Veillard
  • RE: On a more pleasant note, Barry Paul
    • RE: On a more pleasant note, David Megginson
      • RE: On a more pleasant note, Barry Paul
      • RE: On a more pleasant note, David Megginson
  • Re: On a more pleasant note, Tyler Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On a more pleasant note, jmbolles
• XML Schemas in XT, Mallikarjuna Sangappa
• groves.org already taken, Ken MacLeod
  • Re: groves.org already taken, Mark Nutter
    • Re: groves.org already taken, schen
• A compromise?, Don Park
  • Re: A compromise?, David Brownell
    • RE: A compromise?, Don Park
      • RE: A compromise?, Nick Manson
      • Re: A compromise?, David Brownell
      • RE: A compromise?, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A compromise?, Marc.McDonald
• SOAP, Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
• Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Terje Norderhaug
  • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Tyler Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Carlisle
    • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Tyler Baker
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Carlisle
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", Tyler Baker
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another lookatnamespaces", Tyler Baker
    • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
    • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
• RE: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Andrew Layman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Tim Berners-Lee
    • RE: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Don Park
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Len Bullard
    • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Joshua E. Smith
• Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Paul W. Abrahams
  • Re: Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Tony Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Tim Bray
  • Re: Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Paul W. Abrahams
    • Re: Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Tony Graham
  • Re: Unicode surrogate block in XML?, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Transmitting CGI vars to an XML doc., Mike Dierken
• Another try on groves, Paul Prescod
  • RE: Another try on groves, Don Park
  • Re: Another try on groves, Francis Norton
    • Re: Another try on groves, Ken MacLeod
      • Re: Another try on groves, Geir Ove Grønmo
      • Re: Another try on groves, Francis Norton
      • RE: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object. [was.. Another try on Groves], Graham Moore
      • RE: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object. [was.. Another try on Groves], Sean Mc Grath
      • Re: Another try on Groves, Philip Nye
  • Re: Another try on groves, Sean Mc Grath
    • Re: Another try on groves, Ken MacLeod
• More than three namespaces for XHTML? (was Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: More than three namespaces for XHTML? (was Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces), Paul Prescod
• What XHTML should do with namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces, Shane P. McCarron
  • Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What XHTML should do with namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
• (minor correction) Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
• importing xml document in another, Salvatore Usai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: importing xml document in another, DuCharme, Robert
• code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?, James Tauber
  • RE: code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?, Mike Spreitzer
    • Re: code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?, James Tauber
      • RE: code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?, Mike Spreitzer
• FOP 0.10.0 released, James Tauber
• XML parser conformance (Java), David Brownell
• Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Len Bullard
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Len Bullard
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Philip Nye
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Walter Underwood
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Eve L. Maler
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Shane P. McCarron
      • Applications, DTDs, Namespaces (was Re: Another look at namespaces), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Andrew Layman
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Don Park
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Andrew Layman
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Shane P. McCarron
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Abusing namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Abusing namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Abusing namespaces, David Brownell
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, james anderson
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Don Park
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, james anderson
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Hunter, David
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Tyler Baker
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", Tyler Baker
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", Ann Navarro
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces", David Megginson
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", Paul Prescod
      • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces", David Megginson
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Hunter, David
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Tim Bray
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, James Tauber
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, James Tauber
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, James Tauber
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, James Tauber
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Len Bullard
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Andrew Layman
    • Discourse and Discourtesies, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Discourse and Discourtesies, Don Park
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Andrew Layman
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
    • Schemas considered dangerous (was Re: Another look at namespaces), David Megginson
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, james anderson
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Megginson
      • Signifiers/Namespaces (was Re: Another look at namespaces), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Signifiers/Namespaces (was Re: Another look at namespaces), James Tauber
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Bray
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Don Park
      • RE: Another look at namespaces, Ann Navarro
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, MURATA Makoto
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: Another look at namespaces, David Brownell
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, James Tauber
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Another look at namespaces, MURATA Makoto
    • Re: Another look at namespaces, Steven R. Newcomb
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
  • Re: Another look at namespaces, Tim Berners-Lee
• Element Tags vs Attributes, jadams
• W3C Process - suggestions, Reynolds, Gregg
• COM XML parser, Kenn Humborg
  • Re: COM XML parser, Steve Schafer
  • Re: COM XML parser, Richard Anderson
  • Re: COM XML parser, Chris Smith
• RE: xml-dev volume (was: On the record?), DuCharme, Robert
• C/C++ DOM implementation using expat, Hutchison, Nigel
  • RE: C/C++ DOM implementation using expat, Heikki Toivonen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: C/C++ DOM implementation using expat, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: C/C++ DOM implementation using expat, Jun Fujisawa
• XML Phase III begins, Jon Bosak
• ANN: Oracle XML Parser for Java v2.0.2 - Production Release, Mark Scardina
• CNET on XHTML, David Brownell
  • Re: CNET on XHTML, John Cowan
    • Re: CNET on XHTML, Ann Navarro
  • Re: CNET on XHTML, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: CNET on XHTML, Don Park
    • Re: CNET on XHTML, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: CNET on XHTML, Simon St.Laurent
      • admin:more odd filtering, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: admin:more odd filtering, Paul Fidler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: CNET on XHTML, Hunter, David
    • Re: CNET on XHTML, David Brownell
• Extenders (BNF rule 89), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Extenders (BNF rule 89), John Cowan
• Unicode 3.0 is no longer beta, John Cowan
• Wrong list?, C. Field
  • Re: Wrong list?, Marcus Carr
    • Re: Wrong list?, Ronald Bourret
• translator ?, sunker
• XML Announcements, Robin Cover
  • Re: XML Announcements, John Cowan
• Announcement: XML Asia Pacific Conference, Marcus Carr
• Associating Element Node to Document Node, Goyal, Sanjeev
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Associating Element Node to Document Node, Goyal, Sanjeev
    • Re: Associating Element Node to Document Node, David Brownell
• (no subject), Chris Tharpe
• SOAP 0.9, Dave Winer
• RE: On the record? (was Re: Random thought), Ronald Bourret
  • Re: On the record? (was Re: Random thought), Len Bullard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the record? (was Re: Random thought), Tim Bray
    • Re: xml-dev volume (was: On the record?), David Brownell
• RE: More chaos coming down the pike, Mike Spreitzer
  • Re: More chaos coming down the pike, Michael Champion
  • RE: More chaos coming down the pike, schen
• Encoding attribute in IE5/MSXML (Was: RE: MSXML for Java Questions), Nik O
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Encoding attribute in IE5/MSXML (Was: RE: MSXML for Java Questions), Nanshan Zeng
  • RE: Encoding attribute in IE5/MSXML (Was: RE: MSXML for Java Questions), Hunter, David
    • Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Shinichiro HAMADA
      • RE: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Don Park
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Shinichiro HAMADA
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Shinichiro HAMADA
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Walter Underwood
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Shinichiro HAMADA
      • Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication, Joshua E. Smith
• Sybase and XML?, DuCharme, Robert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Sybase and XML?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Sybase and XML?, Ken North
  • RE: Sybase and XML?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: Sybase and XML?, Ken North
• Announcement: XML Convert 1.1, Robert C. Lyons
• XED builds for FreeBSD, Linux now available, bug fixes, Henry S. Thompson
• Random thought, Christopher Lane
  • Re: Random thought, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Random thought, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Random thought, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Random thought, Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Random thought, Tim Bray
    • Re: Random thought, David Megginson
      • Re: Random thought, Ken North
      • RE: Random thought, Don Park
    • Re: Random thought, Ann Navarro
      • On the record? (was Re: Random thought), David Megginson
      • Re: On the record? (was Re: Random thought), Ann Navarro
      • Re: Random thought, Tyler Baker
      • Re: Random thought, Ann Navarro
      • Re: Random thought, John Cowan
      • For official info on US copyright law..., Mark Nutter
      • RE: Random thought, Barclay T. Blair
    • XML news outlets (was Re: Random thought), Simon St.Laurent
• non-ascii namespace name question, Takuki Kamiya
  • Re: non-ascii namespace name question, John Cowan
• Thanks for the sanity check, Christopher Lane
• namespace of attributes?, Mark D. Anderson
  • Re: namespace of attributes?, Joe Lapp
    • Re: namespace of attributes?, Joe Lapp
    • Re: namespace of attributes?, Mark D. Anderson
      • Re: namespace of attributes?, Joe Lapp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: namespace of attributes?, Tim Bray
  • RE: namespace of attributes?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: namespace of attributes?, Andrew Layman
• linking, breaks - simple question, C. Field
• [peter@t...: Re: [schen@f...: Re: DOM and Grove]], Steven R. Newcomb
• Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Rick Jelliffe
• enumeration and defaults, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: enumeration and defaults, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: enumeration and defaults, Tim Bray
    • Re: enumeration and defaults, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: enumeration and defaults, Stewart Rubenstein
      • RE: enumeration and defaults, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: enumeration and defaults, Tim Bray
    • Re: enumeration and defaults, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: enumeration and defaults, John Cowan
  • Re: enumeration and defaults, Tim Bray
• W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Megginson
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Michael Champion
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Megginson
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Brownell
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Ann Navarro
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Ann Navarro
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Brownell
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Ann Navarro
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Tim Bray
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Tim Bray
    • RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Don Park
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Brownell
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Bush Donor Lists in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Megginson
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Megginson
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Brownell
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
  • RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Tim Berners-Lee
    • RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David LeBlanc
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Paul Tchistopolskii
    • RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Don Park
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Dan Brickley
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Ann Navarro
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Daniel Veillard
      • W3C and Open Source (was Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Brownell
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Ann Navarro
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Tim Bray
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', David Megginson
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Len Bullard
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty', Dan Brickley
• LISTADMIN: Errors due to full mailboxes, Rzepa, Henry
• Ps --> xml (or html), David LeBlanc
  • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), James Robertson
    • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), Eve L. Maler
      • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), Lisa Rein
  • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), David Brownell
  • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), Carsten Oberscheid
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), jmbolles
    • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), James Tauber
  • Re: Ps --> xml (or html), Rick Jelliffe
• SAX spec.; C++ apps/parsers?, Michael Fuller
• MSXML for Java Questions, Marko Zerdin
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Erik James Freed
    • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Erik James Freed
    • Re: MSXML for Java Questions, David Brownell
      • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Erik James Freed
      • Re: MSXML for Java Questions, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Erik James Freed
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Marko Zerdin
    • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Erik James Freed
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Chris Lovett
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Marko Zerdin
    • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Julian Reschke
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Marko Zerdin
    • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Julian Reschke
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Hunter, David
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Marko Zerdin
  • RE: MSXML for Java Questions, Hunter, David
    • Re: MSXML for Java Questions, David Brownell
• Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Anthony B. Coates
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, David Megginson
      • Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
      • Re: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, David Megginson
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Tim Bray
    • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Ann Navarro
    • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Marc.McDonald
    • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Ann Navarro
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Marc.McDonald
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Tim Bray
  • RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML, Marc.McDonald
• XML-Editors with pluggable validation, heiko.grussbach
• list administration (was: Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces andvalidation), David Brownell
• Test, please ignore, John Cowan
• Is it possible to overwrite global variables?, Wang, Dapeng
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is it possible to overwrite global variables?, David Carlisle
• [XT] XSL output question, Patrice Bonhomme
• fixing (just) namespaces and validation, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, james anderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, David Carlisle
    • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, David Megginson
    • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, james anderson
      • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, Philip Nye
      • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, David Megginson
      • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, Ingo Macherius
      • DDML (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, james anderson
  • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation, David Carlisle
    • Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Stephen T. Mohr
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Brownell
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), David Megginson
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation), james anderson

      • PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

        Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

        

        Download The World's Best XML IDE!

        Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

        Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.

        Email

        First Name

        Last Name

        Company
        Subscribe in XML format

        RSS 2.0
        Atom 0.3
        Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

        
        

        Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.