[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Another look at namespaces

• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:40:39 -0700

Rick Jeliffe wrote "Andrew Layman's comment that there
are definitional schemas and that these set namespaces is undebated
and can be proved wrong by the simple example of RDF, which
defines a namespace but allows major parts of schemas undefined,..."

I recommend that you return to my original post and look at what I actually
wrote.  You might be pleasantly surprised to find that I am both aware of
and support the idea of namespaces which are not defined by schemas.  :-)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Binary-encoding of XML for communication
• Next by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: Discourse and Discourtesies
• Next by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread