[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 11:37:35 +0100 (BST)

James anderson wrote
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> > 
> > Namespaces and validation are incompatible in cases where the namespace
> > prefix changes for whatever reason, 
> 
> this claim is not universaly true. while there are dtd's for which it holds
> (those with ambiguous prefixes are those with declarations with identical
> prefixed names and no directly specified namespace binding.), this does not
> hold for all dtd's

Surely _all_ DTDs do have this problem with the namespace REC.

The documents

<foo:x xmlns:foo="http://here">
</foo:x>


and

<bar:x xmlns:bar="http://here">
</bar:x>

are fully equivalent according to XML Namespace REC, but it is not
possible to write a DTD such that you can add

<!DOCTYPE foo:x SYSTEM "x.dtd">
<foo:x xmlns:foo="http://here">
</foo:x>

and


<!DOCTYPE bar:x SYSTEM "x.dtd">
<bar:x xmlns:bar="http://here">
</bar:x>

Well, you could write a DTD that worked for any finite set of prefixes,
just by duplicating all the declarations, but you can not write one that
works in general.

So, to validate with namespaces, you either have to pre-process the
document instance to normalise the prefixes to the prefix used in the
DTD, or you have to invent a new declaration in the DTD that says
`this DTD uses prefix foo: but a documenent instance may use any prefix,
so long as is bound to the namespace "http://here"'
This is (I assume) the intention of the PI in Simon's posting.


David

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
  • Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
• Next by Date: Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
• Previous by thread: Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
• Next by thread: Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread