[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another try on groves

• From: Geir Ove Grønmo <grove@i...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 17 Sep 1999 17:11:53 +0200

* Ken MacLeod
| Francis Norton <francis@r...> writes:
| 
| > Now that I have some feeling for the rationale behind Groves, I'd be
| > very interested in knowing what this might mean for implementations.
| > 
| > Could one come up with a language independent API like the DOM, to
| > which Grove compliant APIs would conform? Presumably there is more
| > complexity in that the DOM has a closed set of underlying object
| > types whereas each Grove interface would would have different
| > underlying object types. In Java terms, would this be an interface
| > (a totally abstract class which guarantees a core functionality in
| > any object which implements it)? Has anyone in fact built CORBA IDL
| > or a Java interface defining the Grove API, or am I coming in at the
| > wrong level?
| 
| I'd like to believe you're coming in at the wrong level.  Many
| languages have built-in syntax to access ``members of objects'' or
| ``fields of records'' that can often be applied to accessing
| ``properties of nodes''.  In this case, the grove API is the
| language's native syntax.
| 
| Where native syntax is not applicable, groves most closely resemble
| container classes (dictionaries, mappings, hash tables; lists, arrays,
| sequences).  Again, a language's standard container class interface or
| protocol can be used.

Yes. Think of it more as a data structure instead of as an API, since
there are no methods involved.

Geir O.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Another try on groves
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Another try on groves
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: Another try on groves
    • From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: groves.org already taken
• Previous by thread: Re: Another try on groves
• Next by thread: Re: Another try on groves
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread