[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
Mark Nutter wrote: > >Would it inherit the "c" classification from the ancestor security element > >or would "u" be applied > >because it exists inside the para0 element? > > Isn't this an improper use of processing instructions? Your question seems > to be concerned with which security attribute the processing instruction > would have, but I did not think processing instructions were supposed to > *have* attributes (or child-elements, for that matter). The security level > ought to be completely irrelevant to the processing instruction, shouldn't > it? "Processing instructions (PIs) allow documents to contain instructions for applications." Applications have always made use of processing instructions in wierd and wonderful ways - there's no reason to believe that application designers will always maintain the separation of their use from a characteristic of the data. -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mrc@a... ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|