[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 04:23:34 +0800

Before I start, I should say again that I hope that we can keep this
away from sounding
like attacks on individuals.  Already some W3C people apparantly think
that people
raising serious questions are "agitated" or conspiracy theorists (though
of course
GBS's aphorism along the lines that "Every profession turns into a
conspiracy against
the public" should be salutory to us all).

From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

>On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Steven R. Newcomb wrote:

>> [...] The W3C is a software vendor consortium; people (including W3C
>> members) who believe otherwise are deluding themselves.
>[...]
>
>I'm sorry, I can't let this one just slip past. As Bristol University's
>Advisory Committee representative to W3C, I can assure you that agendas
>other than software vending are represented. Bristol University may be
>many things, and there are many groups here who do produce saleable
>software, but we're not software vendors. We joined W3C to participate
>in the development of specifications that affect teaching, learning and
>research applications in our *.ac.uk environment. And we're not alone
>in this...

(My employer, Academia Sinica, has also recently joined W3C.) It is
clear from (public) member lists that non-commercial interests do not
dominate numerically or financially.


Rick Jelliffe
Not speaking privately, not on behalf of my employer.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: On a more pleasant note
• Next by Date: Re: an unfilled need
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread