[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Another look at namespaces
Paul Prescod writes: > David Megginson wrote: > > > > 1. An application must be able to determine the general language used > > by (part of) a document. > > 2. An application must be able to determine the specific dialect used > > by (part of) a document. > > David, can you please define "general language" and "dialect" in a > manner that I can implement in a computer program? A language is an arbitrary point in a continuum, discovered empirically. For example, consider the following: Marked-up text => SGML => HTML => HTML 4.0 => HTML 4.0 strict There is a very large set of software that can work with HTML (more or less interoperably), but considerably less software that works with SGML in general, and almost nothing that works exclusively with HTML 4.0, much less HTML 4.0 strict. More importantly, there is a well-defined set of behaviours associated with the software that works with HTML, and that set of behaviours is generally considered useful in itself. The same thing applies in natural languages: Indo-European => Germanic => English => Canadian => Ontario => Toronto It's easy but wasteful to make too much of small distinctions, though it's still important to be able to present them. > Is "XML" a general language? Is "XHTML" a dialect? Is "XSLT" a > language and "XSLT used with XSL FOs" a dialect? Please don't > appeal to my common sense or intuition because I have neither and > unfortunately neither does my Pentium 233. It depends on your perspective. Since we're talking about Namespaces in XML documents, then XML itself is the universe, so you can remove it from the equation. XSLT and XSL FOs are separate languages that happen to work well together because they don't really compete (unlike two natural languages, and more like, say, Algebra and English). Of course, we won't know this for certain until there are enough implementations of XSLT and XSL FOs to see how people are using them -- the proof is in the implementation, not the design. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|