[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Layers, again (was Re: fixing (just) namespaces and validation)
David Megginson wrote: > > My fault: I didn't realise that your proposed changes used only PIs. > I'm not sure that I see how the documents could still be valid from > the XML 1.0 perspective, though, and if not, the new documents would > still be backwards incompatible with some (many?) existing XML 1.0 > implementations. It is correct, that some documents which are not valid in terms of xml-1.0 would be valid in the terms discussed. Given that the purpose of namespaces was to express things for which xml-1.0, taken alone, was not sufficient, I count understand this as a benefit. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|