[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Statement from HTML WG

• From: Marc.McDonald@D...
• To: xml-dev@i..., ann@w...
• Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:25:44 -0700

Steve Pemberton wrote:

> Since we were getting different messages from the XML Community, we
> also asked the XML Plenary group to discuss the issue. This (long)
> discussion starts at
> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-plenary/1999Jul/0017.html].
> (See the end of this document for some selections.) The result of these
> discussions seems to show that there isn't consensus on the issue,
> with people arguing quite strongly for both positions.
> 
	Nice to have a reference, but we non-w3C members can't reference the
document. So I have no description of these use cases that justify 3
namespaces. I got a password request on access. The only example given in
the mail is the including XHTML in XML documents which doesn't justify 3
namespaces at all.

> However, the HTML WG is not bound irrevocably to three namespaces. We
> want XHTML to be a good XML citizen, and if the consensus of the XML
> community is that the 3-namespace use-cases are not important and can
> reasonably be ignored, we are willing to go with that consensus.
> 
	Nice to hear this, which appears to be opposite of what had
previously been implied.


> Marc B. McDonald
> Principal Software Scientist
> 
> Design Intelligence, Inc.
> 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 1500
> Seattle, WA  98101
> marc.mcdonald@d...
> Ph: 206.343-7797
> Fax: 206.343.7750
> 
> http://www.design-intelligence.com
> 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Previous by thread: Re: Statement from HTML WG
• Next by thread: Parsers for XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread