[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
> There is no reason why something that is uniquely identified can have only > one definition. Architectural forms are a classic tool for describing this > situtation in markup, and in 'reality' there are many many many many many > many cases where you can have multiple definitions, formal or otherwise, > for the same uniquely identified thing. (Don't get me going into > epistemology, please...) I guess I am misreading the implication that architectural forms allow you to provide multiple content models for a single element type, right? How then do they provide multiple definitions for something that is uniquely identified? It seems to me that precisely the opposite is true: they allow you to share a single definition (in terms of a given element form) among multiple element types with different identities. Matt xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|