[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 21:02:37 -0700

James Tauber wrote:
> 
> 3. Java 2D / Printing. I'd like Fop to be able to print and display on
> screen directly without PDF as well as with and Java 2D / Printing would be
> the obvious way to do this. The modular nature of Fop would enable me to
> perhaps distribute a separate 1.2 application to do this and leave the core
> as 1.1

I certainly like the idea of direct Java2D output!


> Incidently, from 0.10.0 I've been compiling with a 1.2.2 compiler but only
> using 1.1 libraries. Does anyone know if this will still cause problems for
> people using 1.1. (ie should I go back to using a 1.1 compiler).

I'd encourage using the 1.2 compiler; there were some code generation bugs
with the 1.1 compiler that cause problems in various cases you really don't
want to have to debug.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: "Erik James Freed" <ejfreed@i...>

• References:
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: <schen@f...>
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: A compromise?
• Previous by thread: Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
• Next by thread: RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread