[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another look at namespaces

• From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• To: "XML-DEV" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:16:10 -0700

At 04:41 PM 9/15/99 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
>
> [...] the HTML 4.0 spec defined three, and XHTML was required to be
>as direct a mapping from HTML 4.0 to XML as possible.

This is a rationale. Including this with the recent draft
would have saved us all a lot of e-mail traffic.

Rationales are critically important in specs. I read them first.

wunder
--
Walter R. Underwood
Staff Engineer, Infoseek Corp.
wunder@i...
http://software.infoseek.com/cce/ (my product)
http://www.best.com/~wunder/
1-408-543-6946

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Another look at namespaces
    • From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?
• Next by Date: RE: importing xml document in another
• Previous by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread