[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:29:00 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Prescod writes:

 > Part of the zen of SGML (inherited by XML) is that standards exist
 > to protect end users from programmers.

Unfortunately, standards can end up protecting end users from
programmers so effectively that the end users end up with no
off-the-shelf software: that's why it's a good idea for standards
never to go more than one step ahead of current practice.

Remember, the main goals of computer standards are interoperability
and shared development cost.  Many SGML (or CORBA, or what-have-you)
consulting shops rely on exactly the opposite: they make their money
by developing expensive, customized solutions that are only marginally
interoperable, while holding the standards flag over the poor
customer's eyes.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Another look at namespaces
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"
    • From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...>
  • Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Another try on groves
• Next by Date: Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look atnamespaces"
• Previous by thread: Re: XML in the real world... Was "Re: Another look at namespaces"
• Next by thread: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread