XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - June, 2004

• ANN: Oracle XDK 10.1.0.2.0 for AIX, HP-UX64 and LINUX production release, Jinyu Wang
• problem saving microsoft.xmldom object, Martins Keruss
• ANN: Excelsior! Path Preview 0.1, Jim Rankin
• Choosing the correct XML API, Landon Blake
  • Re: Choosing the correct XML API, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• ANN: New XML Differencing, Updated XML Mapping in Stylus Studio 5.3, Ivan Pedruzzi
• Standards and Colonies, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• hi all, karthik bala guru
  • Re: hi all, Mike Fitzgerald
    • Re: hi all, karthik bala guru
      • Re: hi all, Mike Fitzgerald
• [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2004-06-29, Tech Support
• ANN: Fantastic XML editor for OS X - Alpha Test 1, Jim Rankin
• fast-infoset and fast-webservices (ASN.1 and XML), Bob Wyman
• XML 2004: call for artwork, Eve L. Maler
• ANNOUNCEMENT: vtd-xml just released under GPL, Harry Xu
• this is a test, please ignore, Harry Xu
• xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Robert Koberg
  • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Bryce K. Nielsen
    • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Robert Koberg
    • RE: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Takuki Kamiya
      • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Robert Koberg
      • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Bob Foster
      • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Bob Foster
      • Re: xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs], Eric van der Vlist
• RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Hunsberger, Peter
    • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Hunsberger, Peter
    • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Hunsberger, Peter
• RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Hunsberger, Peter
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Frank Richards
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Roger L. Costello
      • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bob Wyman
      • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Danny Ayers
    • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Rick Marshall
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification?, Adam Turoff
  • RE: RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Louis_Smith
• XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Frank Richards
  • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Michael Champion
  • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Rick Marshall
  • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?, Bob Wyman
  • Re: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification orComplexification?, Norman Walsh
• governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned, bry
  • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned, bry
      • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned, Rex Brooks
  • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned, Rex Brooks
• What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml?, Jon Steeves
  • Re: What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml?, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml?, G. Ken Holman
  • Re: What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml?, DaveP
• RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Joshua Allen
  • Re: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets onthe Internet), Robert Koberg
    • Re: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Joshua Allen
    • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bob Wyman
      • Re: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets onthe Internet), Danny Ayers
  • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Unsubscribing, Darryl L. Pierce
• How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets onthe Internet ), Rick Marshall
• ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v2.0: XML DTD to XML Schema Converter, xml-dev
• [Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.0-alpha2 release, Farrukh Najmi
• [ANN] xframe - xsddoc-0.5-beta released, Kurt Riede
• how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void, Varun Suri
  • RE: how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void, W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
    • Re: how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void, John Cowan
      • Re: how to make the order of elements in the DTD null nvoid, Varun Suri
      • Re: how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void, John Cowan
• question about restrictions, Brent Worden
  • Re: question about restrictions, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: question about restrictions, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: question about restrictions, Brent Worden
• OFFTOPIC: Go SpaceShipOne, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: OFFTOPIC: Go SpaceShipOne, Erik Beijnoff
• RE: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms,endless complexity, Thomas B. Passin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assemblymechanisms, endless complexity, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity, Paul Sumner Downey
• RE: Inheritance in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• DTDDoc, Stefan Champailler
• XML schema problem for two definitions of the same element., Hess Yvan
  • Re: XML schema problem for two definitions of the sameelement., George Cristian Bina
• Inheritance in XML, Mohammad Ghazal
  • Re: Inheritance in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Inheritance in XML, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Inheritance in XML, Burak Emir
      • Re: Inheritance in XML, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Inheritance in XML, Burak Emir
• Extreme Late-breaking Call for Participation, B Tommie Usdin
• Re: ebXML examples, Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ebXML examples, Mayne, Peter
    • RE: ebXML examples, Bo Harald
      • Re: ebXML examples, Chiusano Joseph
• ebXML examples, Matthew Carter
  • Re: ebXML examples, Ken North
• Microsoft Proves Pronouns Patentable, Robin Cover
• RE: New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases, Michael Rys
  • Re: New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases, Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases, Michael Rys
• RE: ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread), Scott Wiseman
  • Re: ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread), Dennis Sosnoski
• RE: progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out there?, Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR
  • RE: progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out ther e?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out ther e?, Karl Waclawek
• ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread), Dennis Sosnoski
• SAX dot NET - Unifying Extension interfaces, Karl Waclawek
  • progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out there?, Guillaume Lebleu
• RE: Semantic Web Services, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Semantic Web Services, Chiusano Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Semantic Web Services, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Semantic Web Services, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Semantic Web Services, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Semantic Web Services, Chiusano Joseph
  • RE: Semantic Web Services, Irene Polikoff
  • Re: Semantic Web Services, Mark Baker
    • Re: Semantic Web Services, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Semantic Web Services, Mark Baker
      • Re: Semantic Web Services, Chiusano Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Semantic Web Services, Joshua Allen
    • Re: RE: Semantic Web Services, Thomas B. Passin
• HELP psychotic namespaces!, bry
  • Re: HELP psychotic namespaces!, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: HELP psychotic namespaces!, bry
  • Re: HELP psychotic namespaces!, Chiusano Joseph
• RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing), Paul Sumner Downey
    • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing), Michael Champion
      • RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorothe, Paul Sumner Downey
    • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing), Mark Baker
      • specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Mark Baker
      • RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Paul Sumner Downey
      • Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Michael Champion
      • Re: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Danny Ayers
      • RE: RE: specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother, Paul Sumner Downey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
  • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
    • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Michael Kay
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bill de hÓra
      • XSquiggle ? Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR225), Burak Emir
      • Re: XSquiggle ? Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java(JSR 225), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bob Foster
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Michael Kay
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • loose coupling, was Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery forJava (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Rich Salz
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Rich Salz
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Ken North
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bob Foster
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bob Foster
      • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Tor Helland
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Burak Emir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Michael Kay
    • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Liam Quin
      • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Michael Kay
      • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), 'Liam Quin'
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), tpassin
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Rob Griffin
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225), Rob Griffin
• Prospero and other URLs with // in path, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: Prospero and other URLs with // in path, Pete Forman
• RE: Triplets on the Internet, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Rich Salz
    • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Kal Ahmed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Kal Ahmed
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Joshua Allen
    • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Paul Sumner Downey
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Kal Ahmed
      • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Rich Salz
      • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Kal Ahmed
      • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Kal Ahmed
  • Re: Triplets on the Internet, tpassin
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Triplets on the Internet, Danny Ayers
  • RE: Triplets on the Internet, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Triplets on the Internet, tpassin
• RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Joshua Allen
  • Re: RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
• XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text, Patrik Beno
  • Re: XML schema: how to define choice between value as anattribute and value as element text, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text, Michael Kay
  • Re: XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text, Bryce K. Nielsen
    • RE: XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text, Michael Kay
• Leading the web...elsewhere?, Danny Ayers
  • Re: Leading the web...elsewhere?, Michael Champion
    • Re: Leading the web...elsewhere?, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Leading the web...elsewhere?, Michael Champion
• XSLT subtree pruning/ filtering using namespace, Chisanga Mwelwa
  • RE: XSLT subtree pruning/ filtering using namespace, Michael Kay
• EFF seeking ten patents to challenge (deadline 23 June), Ken North
• Another approach to semantic alignment, Michael Champion
  • Re: Another approach to semantic alignment, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: Another approach to semantic alignment, Jonathan Borden
• [ANN] Saxon 8.0 - Schema-Aware XSLT and XQuery processing, Michael Kay
• Announce: Public XSLT/XSL-FO training in Phoenix in August [XML-Dev], G. Ken Holman
• Fertile SemWebApps, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Joshua Allen
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Mark Baker
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: Meta-somethingorother, Michael Champion
      • Re: How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: Meta-somethingorother, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: How I learned to stop worrying and love the semanticweb - was Re: Meta-somethingorother, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Danny Ayers
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Danny Ayers
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing), Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Mark Baker
      • RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: Meta-somethingorother, Michael Champion
      • Re: RDF == the "binary relational model"?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: Meta-somethingorother, Frank Manola
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Mark Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Joshua Allen
    • RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Bill de hÓra
      • RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing), Didier PH Martin
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing), John Cowan
      • Re: Interesting