|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathrea
Hi Bill > I've always felt that the stuff that Tim BL and Joshua Allen talk > about requires a "signal processing" layer to get from data to > metadata. That's not present in the SemWeb layer cakes I've seen. > Miles Sabin quite rightly mentioned that GOFAI has yet to prove > itself worthy, but there are systems out there where stuff > remsembling usable GOFAI has been built, but on top of scruffy AI > tech, not handcrafted ontologies. I agree > Suppose it was 1935 and I said: bottom line I don't know whether > these proposed computing machines can solve the > Entscheidungsproblem. Does that make computing today not useful by > virtue of being restricted to limited applications (or as Picasso > pointed out, computers can only give you answers)? This stuff > doesn't have to be formally correct or all encompassing to be useful. > I agree, knowledge representation tech. is useful to certain domain applications; in a couple of years, probably more than that. But as you know, progress is as slow as a slug. In the meantime the TAP project from Standard is addressing some of my concerns from the operational point of view (ref: http://tap.stanford.edu/j1.html) Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








