[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web

• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
• Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:44:00 +0200
• Cc: Ari Nordström <mayfair@t...>, XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <p06010208bce9f8884d74@[192.168.254.88]>
• References: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOKEAAEMAA.howardk@f...> <6.1.0.6.2.20040606202821.028cb7d0@p...> <p06010204bce92d448ba4@[192.168.254.88]> <200406062316.58903.mayfair@t...> <p06010208bce9f8884d74@[192.168.254.88]>

On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 12:54, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> 
> If manual intervention were required for every 
> message, this approach wouldn't scale or work. In 
> practice, manual intervention isn't required all 
> that often after the system is initially 
> developed and deployed.

The problem is that manual intervention is required every time someone
has added new tags arbitrarily.

Even if the new markup does not change the workings of existing parts of
the system, someone must still spend time checking it out. Otherwise,
how would one know that the new information does not affect the existing
system?

/Henrik

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Ari Nordström <mayfair@t...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Previous by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread