[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb per


Re:  The triples datamodel -- was Re:  SemanticWeb per
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 00:06, Alaric B Snell wrote:

> Information about the structure of a site gleaned from viewing the 
> source may be subject to random change; if the site published a schema 
> (be it a formal machine-readable schema or a paragraph of text like 
> above), they would then have the opportunity to also state how far users 
> can rely on that not changing in future. They may lie, of course, but 
> people will have more cause to complain if they "said" they wouldn't 
> change it; so when some software that relies on it breaks, the author of 
> the software can say "Hey! The news site broke its promise" rather than 
> "Uh, I made an assumption that no longer holds"...

They did make a promise about what schema to use:

<!DOCTYPE html 
     PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
     "DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">


Using the XHTML 1.0 doctype declaration constitutes a promise to stick
to XHTML, and not to mix in elements and attributes from namespaces
that have not been declared in the XHTML DTD.

And of course, they used non-conformant markup:

<quoteoftheday>
<blockquote cite=
"http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com/2004_05_23_seanmcgrath_archive.html#108576202776583412">
Always do a tag-share analysis before writing an XML
up/down/cross-translate in XSLT or DOM/SAX or whatever. 
A remarkably small number of element types make up the 
bulk of the markup - <em>regardless of the size of the schema</em>.
</blockquote>
	
<p>--Sean Mcgrath <br />
Read the rest in <a href=
"http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com/2004_05_23_seanmcgrath_archive.html#108576202776583412">
XML tag share analysis and power law distributions </a>
</p>	
</quoteoftheday>

So, it would be fully justifiable to say that the site made a promise about what schema to use, and broke it.

I wonder why, though. I can understand bending, or even breaking, rules when
there is a distinct advantage to it. There does not seem to be in this
case, because they could just as easily have done this:

<div class="quoteoftheday">
   ...
</div>


/Henrik


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.