Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible v
 You
said it: an evolvable system can accrete new features, although I am
uncertain if novelty is required.
However, to be evolution in the strictest sense, it must be a feature
which subsequent copies or inheritors
of the
system propagate. I'll call that 'viability' meaning this is a feature
that will cause this system
to be
selected more often than siblings/versions without it,and therefore
increases the frequency of
occurrence of the system. Evolution deals with populations.
One should also point out as Jarron
Lanier
has, the time scale over which biological evolution works. Anyway, let me
pose the following
qualties because they characterize control types:
1. Random evolution: a feature is added by a mistake.
May be viable.
2. Directed evolution: a feature is added by
intension. Is viable or else is a mistake.
3. Emergence: a feature is added by a coupling of intensions
and/or mistakes. Is viable by definition.
BTW: have you considered
o what happens if one routes values to the frequency and occurrence
indicators of
a schema or a schema of
schemas?
o that your *related to* is a typed URI to a resource and you are
delving into Page Rank as a
selector for services?
len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
