Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb per
and if the schema changes, but not the xslt, and someone suffers financial loss - tax returns fail, orders lost, etc - who pays? or will this be a whole new endeavour for lawyers? do i need extra profesional indemnity to cover what happens when you change something without telling me? this thread is starting to worry me.... rick Thomas B. Passin wrote: > Henrik Martensson wrote: > >> On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 20:19, Thomas B. Passin wrote: >> >>> Better to be good at xslt! >> >> >> >> What would you have done if you had to deal with information from fifty >> different sites, and all fifty made their own, frequently incompatible, >> changes? (This is a far more common situation in my line of work than >> having to deal with only one data provider.) >> >> Writing fifty different XSLT stylesheets does not sound like a good >> solution. >> > > It sounds pretty good to me, if I don't have a way to arrange for all > of them to supply the same format. > >> I can understand your reluctance to require that the data provider >> conforms to a particular schema when you are dependent on them, instead >> of the other way around. > > > It wasn't our reluctance, but the near (or total) impossibility. But > note that in this case, unlike the second vignette I posted, we were > working to a schema, in fact, two of them - theirs and ours. The fact > that their schema itself had some technical errors that I had to > correct (and informed them about), and that it was a little out of > sync with the actual delivered format, tells me that they did not have > a complete process in place for managing quality control. And this is > not unusual. > > Here's the thing ... there is no one solution because all the cases > are different. XML has a remarkable ability to cope with so many of > these environments, which is perhaps one reason it has insinuated > itself into so many places. In a case where there is a closely > connected team, and all parties can be forced or pursuaded to use a > given schema, you may be able to achieve everybody's conformance. > > Other cases are more Walter Perry-ish, and that approach is not an > option no matter how desirable it would be. And there are all degrees > in between. > > > Cheers, > > Tom P >
begin:vcard fn:Rick Marshall n:Marshall;Rick email;internet:rjm@z... tel;cell:+61 411 287 530 x-mozilla-html:TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format