[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Bruce Perens and yet more patents

• To: "'Featherstone, Richard'" <Richard.Featherstone@b...>, 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Bruce Perens and yet more patents
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 08:50:25 -0500

One could interpret it as being more general or less but I 
believe handhelds are the intended target.

The odd thing to me is I can't recall Microsoft ever pursuing 
a patent litigation even when these are quite lucrative.  While 
I don't like the pursuit of frivolous patents, I like even 
less the assertion that imply MS holding a patent is more dangerous 
than any other bigCo.  Nothing good will come of this until 
smart people and organizations use the patenting process to 
protect domains of intellectual property.  Once again, look 
at the potential for the three legs of smart standards and 
standards organizations as IP keiretsu.  

Fear is the mindkiller.  - Herbert

len


From: Featherstone, Richard [mailto:Richard.Featherstone@b...]

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@i...] 

>From what I am reading, the patent only applies to handhelds. 

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1
&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,727,830.WKU.&OS=PN/6,727,830&RS=P
N/6,727,830

"This invention relates generally to computer systems, and more particularly
to increasing the functionality of application buttons on a limited resource
computing device."

I'm no expert on these matters but 'limited resource computing device' can
be applied to many devices.  Does a mobile/cell phone with speed dial fall
foul of this patent?

It just worries me that a patent can be obtained for 'inventions' like this
and exactly what Microsoft may choose to due with such a patent.

• Prev by Date: RE: The triples datamodel
• Next by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Previous by thread: RE: Bruce Perens and yet more patents
• Next by thread: RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Webpermathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread