[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) shoul

• To: bry@i..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:07:27 -0700
• In-reply-to: <1088067645.40da983d49ba7@h...>
• References: <1088067645.40da983d49ba7@h...>

No. Do you have a url for this publication, with date-time stamp? I'd 
like to know the rationale.

Ciao,
Rex

At 11:00 AM +0200 6/24/04, bry@i... wrote:
>Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in 
>a government
>publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as 
>either ones that
>should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
>should be abandoned and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
>1.1, and WSDL 1.1?
>
>Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted, and data integration with xml is
>recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP. Although not if I
>ask anyone around here.
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>


-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@s...
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request

• References:
  • governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
    • From: bry@i...

• Prev by Date: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Next by Date: RE: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet)
• Previous by thread: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Next by thread: XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread